|
Lesson six - The parable
of the prodigal son (pages 12-13)
Aims for the book
- To introduce pupils to key events from the life of Jesus and
the way in which these raise questions about the person of Jesus.
- To enable pupils to understand the importance of these events
at the time of Jesus.
- To enable pupils to reflect on the relevance of these events
for Christians today.
- To encourage pupils to raise questions about these events in
the light of their own experience.
Learning objectives
Pupils will:
- develop empathy with different characters in the story of the
Prodigal Son;
- draw on their own experiences and relate these to this parable;
- express their views clearly in oral and symbolic forms.
Text from the book
Try to imagine yourself in this story. Who do you side with? Who
is the most interesting character?
A man had two sons. One asked for his share of his father’s money.
He went off and spent it all at once. He was then so poor, he had
to live with the pigs and eat their food. He decided to go home
and ask for forgiveness. His father welcomed him with open arms
and prepared a great feast. His brother was jealous. He could not
understand why their father was so happy that his lost son had come
home.
Background
Jesus used parables to teach – but to teach what? Is it: the forgiveness
of the father; the penitence and humility of the son; the resentfulness
of the brother; the futility of riches; money can’t buy friendship?
Try not to worry about the meaning and explore some of the feelings
pupils imagine the story’s character might have had. Stories are
always interpreted in different ways in different times and places.
The sculptor, Solomon Saprid, captures the anguish of the returning
son.
Ways of using the picture
- Ask the pupils which character attracts them most/least.
- Which character do the pupils have most sympathy with, and why?
- Can the pupils associate themselves with any character in the
story? Can they see something of themselves in every character?
Bible reference
Luke 15.11-32
Key words
- Forgiving
- Lost
- Redemption found
- Greed
- Jealous
- Forgiveness
- Parable
- Welcome
- Family
- Share
- Relationship
Activity
You will need
Modelling material, such as clay, plasticene
To forgive or not to forgive? That is the question.
Pupils could re-enact the story to develop empathy with the characters.
Each group could produce a script for a radio play with directions
and sound (this will ensure familiarity with the story).
Regroup the pupils so that all the ‘son’ characters are together,
all the ‘father’ characters are together and likewise the ‘returning
sons’.
Each group could then prepare their case for whether the father
in the story should forgive his returning son.
Hold a class debate on the issue using pupils as spokespeople and
jury, encouraging all to vote in the end.
Assessment opportunities
Pupils could record their learning by producing their own sculpted
image of the character with whom they have most sympathy (in clay
or plasticene) and explain reasons for their choice.
Learning outcomes
Pupils will;
- have familiarised themselves with the parable of the Prodigal
Son and reflected on the role of the different characters in the
story;
- have debated the actions of the charaters in the story;
- have produced figures which represent characters from the story.
Extension work
The pupils could consider times in their own lives when they have
had to say sorry and ask for forgiveness.
Web site links
http://www.artchive.com/rembrandt/prodigal.html
Perhaps the most famous of all versions of the Prodigal Son
is Rembrandt's. Another more recent version can be found at http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/bible/prodigal.stm
. "Return of the Prodigal" by Frank Wesley (India, 20th
century). The color pink, according to Hindu tradition, signifies
eternity and eternal power. Wesley used pink to show the father
in the parable as God. At the left side, the pink blends into the
color of the son's clothing to show that God came into the world.
A beautifully simple version can be found at http://www.rshm.org/share2/
.
© Alan Brown and Alison Seaman, 2002
Top of the page
|